Categories
Law

What is your experience with airbnb’s?

Operators of Airbnb’s are being targeted by zoning boards, neighborhood groups, owners of bed & breakfast establishments, and even hotel chains, for the “transient” nature of their guests and the lack of regulatory controls over their use of otherwise residential space. Generally, the short-term, deeply discounted rental space consists of a bedroom with shared bathroom use. However, some operators of Airbnb’s rent out entire apartments and even multi-bedroom homes by the night. In some communities owners of bed & breakfasts have seen their rentals reduced by fifty percent or more, with some even forced to close up their businesses entirely. Then there is the story of the former owner of a bed & breakfast in Washington State who closed the Inn, had it rezoned back to a residence, then operated as an Airbnb, selling out all of its five bedrooms 52 weekends a year.
What is your experience with Airbnb’s? Are you empathetic to the bed & breakfast owners and hoteliers who pay added hospitality taxes and increased real property taxes overall, and are unable to compete with the low nightly rates charged by operators of Airbnb’s, many of whom are apartment renters themselves? What about the zoning boards and community groups who complain about overcrowding and are suspect of the quality of the guests that frequent Airbnb’s? Are these concerns real? Or, do you agree with the operators of Airbnb’s who say, “It’s my space and I’ll do with it whatever I wish!”? They are clearly profiting from the short stay rents and most city ordinances are way behind in drawing up regulations, including taxes, etc., that would make Airbnb rentals less attractive financially to operate. Will it fizzle out as the tax codes, fire codes, building ordinances, etc., catch up with them, or are they more like Uber and Lyft, destined to be ubiquitous in our new society that eschews paying for more than it needs?
PLEASE NOTE THAT I HAVE NO EXPERINCE WITH AIRBNB

Categories
Law

Format of legal memorandum:

instructions:
Prepare a legal memorandum that evaluates the following issues:
1) Does Ave Maria University have standing to bring this case against the United States?
2) Did Congress unlawfully delegate law-making power to the President by enacting s. 101 of FSDA?
Format of Legal Memorandum:
Structure your memoranda as follows:
Summarize the relevant facts in one short paragraph.
Explain the legal issue(s) raised by this case. If there is more than one issue, consider the first legal issue in Part I and the second legal issue in Part II.
For each legal issue, consider how the law (as written in the Constitution and as interpreted by precedent) could be applied to favor the petitioner.
For each legal issue, consider how the law could be applied to favor the respondent.
For each legal issue, analyze the merits/weaknesses of the petitioner’s argument.
For each legal issue, analyze the merits/weaknesses of the respondent’s argument.
Draw a reasoned conclusion as to how the law ought to be applied (for or against the petitioner), giving reasons for this conclusion.

Categories
Law

Assignment needs to be referenced to the australian legal system and the relevant autority used has to be either commonwealth and victorian law reports or australian cases relevant to the question

4 questions, 1400 words per question. Assignment needs to be referenced to the Australian Legal System and the relevant autority used has to be either Commonwealth and Victorian Law reports or Australian cases relevant to the question

Categories
Law

As the president of your state fire chiefs association, you are concerned that not all agencies are aware of the numerous laws, national codes, and regulations that can affect a local fire department.

As the president of your state fire chiefs association, you are concerned that not all agencies are aware of the numerous laws, national codes, and regulations that can affect a local fire department. You want to provide a simple tool to help them identify their potential legal risks and liabilities. Create a checklist of legal acts, national codes and standards, and implications that place an emergency services agency at risk. Include each of the following items for the topics or issues you choose.
Provide the item or topic of interest that could be a risk or liability.
Include the potential law or code associated with the topic.
Provide a brief description of the law or code, including any court decisions that can influence emergency services agencies.
Include a reference for each item that they could access for further information.
This is a checklist, not a general form of questions or statements. It should be the final format of a checklist with the inclusion of a title page. Include items that we have covered throughout this course. You should include at least 15 topics, and your finished checklist should be at least three pages. Provide the references for your sources in APA style.

Categories
Law

Assignment needs to be referenced to the australian legal system and the relevant autority used has to be either commonwealth and victorian law reports or australian cases relevant to the question

4 questions, 1400 words per question. Assignment needs to be referenced to the Australian Legal System and the relevant autority used has to be either Commonwealth and Victorian Law reports or Australian cases relevant to the question

Categories
Law

Question 1

Question 1
Can a first responder post prejudiced remarks on personal social media accounts and be held professionally accountable? Discuss if these discriminatory attitudes impact job performance and if there are repercussions for employers. Is the employer liable if it takes no action?
Question 2
Can a sworn officer wear a religious headdress while on duty? Explain your answer, supplying at least two references to support your argumen

Categories
Law

Date:

Please respond to this questions, the case study is Zwick v. Lodewijk (Find attached)
Documents attached are here to help you to respond to this questions. if you need help please let me know ph:+12089487540 @:marcmkdi@outlook.com
DATE:
CASE IDENTIFICATION (Fill out the three types of identification below)
Case Name:
Case Identification Number:
Case Docket Number:
TYPE OF PROCEEDING (Original or Appeal):
PRESIDING COURT:
PARTIES if Original
Plaintiff:
Defendant:
PARTIES if Appeal (Parties are sometimes reversed if there is an appeal) Appellant:
Appellee:
FACTS OF CASE: If original case, state those facts. If case is an appeal, list original facts plus arguments brought up during the appeal that affirmed or overturned the original decision.

Categories
Law

If so, how and why?

Instructions: Winne and Ralph have concerns about the Statute of Frauds and electronic contracts. To respond to their concerns, you must address the following questions: A. Discuss whether the contract between Company X and Windows Bright is subject to the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code Statute of Frauds. B. Analyze and explain whether the electronic internet contract between Company X and Windows Bright satisfies the “writing” requirements for the Statute of Frauds? If so, how and why? Number each section as: A. B. TEMPLATE IS PROVIDED IN ATTACHEMENTS AS WELL AS SOURCES TO USE. General Background: The Viral Clean (“Clean”) owners have questions and need clarification about several contract concepts and issues related to their new business. Specifically, they have questions about: the Statute of Frauds “writing requirement” and electronic contracts Clean will be selling products via the internet, and the owners wonder whether these electronic contracts are valid and enforceable. TLG discusses the following case with the owners to explain the Statute of Frauds. Background Facts You Need To Know: Company X, a company in Illinois, contracted via the internet with Windows Bright, a small window washing business in Missouri, to purchase four cases of Shiny Lite window cleaning solution at $200 per case. Company X paid via the internet with a company credit card, and an electronic contract was created. The electronic contract stated that the four cases of Shiny Lite would be shipped to Company X’s place of business in Illinois via UPS. Once UPS delivered the Shiny Lite, the contract required Windows Bright to clean Company X’s windows.

Categories
Law

Academic sources only

Hamdi V. Rumsfeld
For this paper you will conduct an analysis of Hamdi V. Rumsfeld. This paper needs to identify and define key legal issues, explain the decision of the court, the relationship to other cases (if applicable), and the significance of the case for homeland security.
Independent research is expected. ACADEMIC SOURCES ONLY

Categories
Law

The separate opinions and dissents should only be considered (if relevant or of particular interest) in the analytical section.

AGLC4 referencing style Write a critical review of the following two cases based on their similarities and differences: Case 1: IMM v R (2016) 257 CLR 300 (analyse only the judgment by French CJ, Kiefel, Bell, and Keane JJ) File : IMM v The Queen (2016)_257_CLR_300.pdf Download IMM v The Queen (2016)_257_CLR_300.pdf AND Case 2: R v Bauer (a pseudonym) (2018) 266 CLR 56 File : R v Bauer (a pseudonym) (2018)_266_CLR_56-1.pdf Download R v Bauer (a pseudonym) (2018)_266_CLR_56-1.pdf The essay should include three parts: two case note sections (roughly 500 words each) and a comparison section (roughly 500 words). Each note should include: An introduction A brief summary of relevant facts The questions addressed by the courts The legal principles enunciated in the cases (including rationes decidendi) The courts’ decisions (including any separate judgments or dissenting opinions) The third section highlights the research component of this assignment. In this section, you need to go beyond the two cases on which the assignment is based. Your research could include, for example, other cases and peer reviewed journal articles. Whatever resources you use, they should zero in on the evidence issues raised by the two cases. This section should also include: Your analyses of the courts’ decisions and conclusions in the two cases, and How the decisions/principles compare or contrast between the cases. You will be expected to use other authorities, including cases, outside the two given cases. Further Guidance Introduction: As with legal academic essays, the introduction of a case note should be short and functional. The introduction orients the reader to the issues raised by the case, the court’s reasoning and the author’s opinion of the decision. Summary: this should be succinct and should not attempt to set out in extensive detail every separate opinion or dissent. The separate opinions and dissents should only be considered (if relevant or of particular interest) in the analytical section. You must save the majority of words for your analysis. Analysis: This section should form by far the largest part of your case note and is where the most marks are allocated. Here, you are evaluating the court’s reasoning. As part of that evaluation, you may wish to consider whether significant factors, principles or approaches were overlooked or undervalued; whether some sources of international law or rules were given due consideration or distinguished appropriately; whether the court’s conclusions were justified by its reasoning. You may also wish to identify significant implications of the case that go beyond the specific effects of the judgement. For instance, did the court adopt a particular approach to the interpretation of the law? Was this in keeping with previous cases? Is this significant? Such an evaluation goes beyond the narrow scope of the litigation, whilst bearing in mind that court decisions are, as you know, binding on lower courts. Conclusion: this should be brief and succinct, summarising your opinion and reasoning in relation to the case. You should introduce any new material at this point of the paper. Detailed Criteria for Assessment of Assignment Thought, Content, Argument and Analysis • Demonstrates understanding of key materials and concepts related to the selected topic. • Develops arguments or ideas logically and persuasively • Supports arguments/ideas with evidence and reasons • Critical analysis of issues discussed • Originality Structure/Organisation • Organises material in a clear, logical manner to support ideas and/or argument(s) • Coherently linked ideas • Effective use of sections, paragraphing and/or headings Research Skills and Use of Source Materials • Uses an appropriate range of relevant sources, including sources beyond the required readings • Demonstrates close reading of source materials Expression and Presentation • Uses accurate grammar, spelling and punctuation • Communicates ideas clearly • Engagingly and effectively communicates understanding and argument • Acknowledges all sources appropriately • Accurate referencing/citation